Ethernet Over Plastic Optical Fiber
|
Plastic Optical Fiber (POF) has emerged as a low-cost alternative to traditional copper cabling in office, home and automotive networks. Continued growth for POF is estimated to be worth in excess of $1 billion a year by the end of 2008. |
POF offers many benefits to the user: it is lightweight,
robust, cheap and easy to install; the use
of 650nm red LED light makes it completely safe
and easier to diagnose as red light can be seen
by the human eye. Installation is further simplified
as existing mains cable ducting can be used to
route the fiber without any impact from noise
interference. The fact that fiber is totally immune to
electromagnetic noise and emits no radiation is
one of the biggest advantages in today’s complex
and congested world of networking.
Differences Between Plastic and Glass Fiber
POF differs from traditional optical fiber in
material and core/cladding dimensions (Figure 1).
POF has a much larger core diameter compared
to both Single-Mode Fiber (SMF) and Multi-Mode
Fiber (MMF). Although this results in lower data
rates (100s of Mbps) and lower reach, there is a
big advantage in terms of cost.
The large core means the accuracy of alignment
between the LED driver and fiber is less critical,
to a point where even slightly damaged fiber is
acceptable. Most of the expense in fiber systems
today is not in the Bill Of Materials (BOM) but
production set-up and alignment costs.
Standard fiber-optic cables have a glass quartz
core and cladding. POF typically utilizes a
polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) core and a fluoropolymer
cladding. Glass fiber-optic cable offers
lower attenuation than its plastic counterpart, but
POF provides a more rugged cable, capable of
withstanding a tighter bend radius.

Figure 1. Single-mode, multi-mode and POF core/cladding diameters
POF Over Ethernet
POF has generally been utilized in more niche
applications where its advantages outweigh
the need for high bandwidth. Advances in LED
technology and Vertical Cavity Surface Emitting
Laser (VCSEL) technology are enabling POF
to support data rates of 3Gbps and above,
opening the doors
to more mainstream
applications.
However, for POF to
become a serious alternative
to copper cable
networks it must be
able to support Ethernet,
since it is almost
exclusively used as
the lower layers in any
office network and is
beginning to dominate
factory and home
networks.
There are a number of
different Fiber-Optic
Transceivers (FOTs) designed
to provide Fast
Ethernet (100Mbps)
via POF. However, unlike
traditional FOTs,
such transceivers lack
a common interface
standard, both electrically
and physically. So
will this hold back the
introduction of Ethernet
over POF? Not necessarily,
as it depends
on the flexibility of
existing Ethernet device specifications. Micrel
Semiconductor, for example, offers an Ethernet
family of multi-port switches and PHYs ideal for
POF transceivers. Virtually any differential input
can be interfaced to the receiver due to the wide
range common-mode and voltage-swing input
specifications (50mV pk-pk to Vdd).
The implementation shown in Figure 2 provides a
Fast Ethernet link over POF with a typical reach of
100 meters, comparable to a standard CAT5 solution.
Any differences in the signal’s common-mode
voltage are removed by AC-coupling the interfaces.
An adjustable voltage reference, LM4041,
is used to ensure the signal detect input FXSD is
in the correct FX mode when a signal is detected
(greater than 2.2V) and loss of signal (between 1V
and 1.8V). The 10k and 6k resistors are used to
adjust the reference voltage across the LM4041
to around 2V. This acts to clamp the FXSD input at
1.3V (Vcc–Vref) when the EDL300D Signal Detect
pin (SD) is low (LVCMOS <0.4V). When a signal is
present the SD pin is high (>2.4V), thus no current
will flow through the reference voltage diode and
FXSD will follow the SD pin voltage (>2.4V).

Figure 2. Interfacing Ethernet devices to POF transmitter and receiver
Conclusion
POF technology offers an attractive alternative
to traditional glass optical fiber as well as copper
for industrial, office, home and automotive networks.
It is low cost, light weight, easy and safe to
install and EMC immune. However, to become
a mainstream alternative to copper cabling in
such networks, POF needs to support Ethernet.
To achieve this, a variety of different media converter
Ethernet solutions are available from Micrel
Semiconductor, offering support for 100Base-FX
networks as well as legacy 10Base-FL or 100Base-
SX applications. These mean that despite a lack of
standards, interfacing POF to Ethernet can be a
straightforward task.