Previous Page   Next Page

 

Design Tools for Optimizing the Performance of Solid-State Lighting Systems


Page Contents:   [ Featured Products | Datasheets | Application Notes | Buy Now ]




Every engineer designing an LED luminaire will have a target for lumen output, longevity and efficiency. But as Figure 1 shows, the interactions of the key variables in solid-state lighting – heat and current – are complex. They also differ from one manufacturer’s part to another’s.

 


Figure 1. Relationship between variables affecting LED operation

 

Unfortunately, LED manufacturers’ datasheets do not necessarily make it easy for engineers to take these and other performance variables into account when making system design decisions. For instance, one factor which defines LED system performance is the reliability of the LEDs. LEDs do not normally fail completely as a traditional incandescent light source does. Instead, LEDs show a decline in lumen output from a peak when the LED is new. So reliability in LEDs is expressed in terms of ‘lumen maintenance’, the rate of decline of lumen output against hours of use.

Generally, reliability data from LED manufacturers provides an average or typical representation of the lumen maintenance at a specific current and junction temperature. In reality, however, LEDs degrade differently over time, even with LEDs from the same reel. Figure 2 illustrates the existence of a distribution in both lumen depreciation and time. As a result, it is critical to include a probability factor when discussing lifetime and lumen maintenance.

 


Figure 2. Lumen maintenance distribution curves.
Source: Philips Lumileds

 

For lighting designers to make informed design decisions, they will need access to such distribution information. LED manufacturer Philips Lumileds has addressed this requirement by expressing LED lifetime data in terms of (Bxx, Lyy). For instance, (B10, L70) would mean that 10% of the LED population will fail to maintain 70% lumen maintenance at a specific current, junction temperature and elapsed operating time. This lifetime data is presented graphically with reference to drive current and junction temperature (see Figure 3).

 


Figure 3. (Bxx,Lyy) Lifetime curves for LUXEON® LEDs

 

To incorporate all the above concepts, and to manipulate the design variables in order to achieve the best performance, the LED Reliability Tool (LRT) and the Usable Light Tool (ULT), available free at www.FutureLightingSolutions.com, can be used to make design trade-off decisions and to provide designers with a true real-world analysis of high power LEDs.

The application of these tools is best illustrated through an example. Many lighting equipment manufacturers now face the requirement to meet government mandated performance specifications – one such is the US government’s Energy Star Program for Solid-State Lighting.

The Energy Star standard for a commercial recessed downlight, for example, requires the luminaire to have a minimum light output of 575lm, minimum efficacy of 35lm/W and 70% lumen maintenance at a minimum of 35,000 hours. The ULT can be used to calculate light output, junction temperature and efficacy for systems using LUXEON® LEDs from Philips Lumileds.

For instance, running the ULT using eight, 90-lumen Cool White LUXEON Rebel LEDs, at 750mA current with an ambient temperature of 30°C, using a heatsink with thermal resistance of 5°C/W, will generate 1021 lumens of usable light, junction temperature of 127°C and efficacy of 54.86lm/W, as shown in Figure 4.

 


Figure 4. ULT calculations for a recessed downlight example

 

The light output results in the ULT are adjusted for heat but not for optical or electrical losses due to secondary optics and driver efficiency. Therefore, to account for the optical losses first, an optical efficiency of 80% will be assumed for the secondary optics. Incorporating the optical losses will decrease the ULT results to to 43.9lm/W efficacy and 816 lumen output, which meet the Energy Star requirements. Furthermore, to account for the electrical losses, which will only affect the efficacy of the system, an electrical efficiency of 65% will be assumed. Incorporating those electrical losses will finally decrease the ULT efficacy result to 37.3lm/W, which still meets the Energy Star requirements.

 


Figure 5. LRT lifetime calculations and curve

 

Since the optical and electrical performance specifications have been met, the LED Reliability Tool can now be used to determine whether the design will meet the lifetime requirement of 35,000 hours. Figure 5 illustrates an LRT lifetime output screenshot for a LUXEON Rebel LED with a probability distribution of (B10, L70), drive current of 750mA and junction temperature of 127°C. This scenario, where the data originates from the ULT output, generates an expected lifetime of 42,000 hours, thus surpassing the Energy Star lifetime target, in addition to the lumen output and efficacy specifications for recessed downlight applications. It is worth noting that all LRT results have a confidence interval of 90%.

The above design can be further refined by adjusting the thermal management solution. The designer may wish to modify the LED drive current, heatsink, the luminaire fixture, the ambient conditions and instantly verify the effects of these adjustments on the overall system. In order to accomplish this task, QLED thermal design and simulation software, available at www.FutureLightingSolutions.com, can be used. QLED guides users through step-by-step design wizards to select, place and simulate power LEDs mounted on FR-4 boards or MCPCBs.

Additionally, users can seamlessly integrate thermal vias, heatsinks, fans and fixtures to generate the most accurate transient or steadystate thermal simulations. Figure 6 demonstrates a QLED project before and after the thermal simulation for the 8-LED recessed downlight application using LUXEON Rebel LEDs.

 


Figure 6. QLED Thermal simulation demonstration

 

It is evident that obtaining a real world analysis of an LED lighting system and determining the effects of design trade-offs prior to building it can significantly save time, cost and effort in the prototyping cycle. Likewise, using tools that perform calculations and help to instantly verify the effects of adjustments on the overall system will provide a more comprehensive end result.

Tools such as the Usable Light Tool, the LED Reliability Tool and QLED, all available at www.FutureLightingSolutions.com, can be used to ease the design and prototyping stage and showcase immediate results. These results enable designers to further refine design parameters and achieve improved performance for their design in order to develop efficient systems, both optically and thermally, to meet specifications of emerging standards.

 

About Future Lighting Solutions

Future Lighting Solutions is the leading provider of LED lighting components and solution support for lighting designers and OEMs interested in taking advantage of solid-state lighting technology. Future Lighting Solutions provides LED lighting knowledge, resources, programs, partners, solutions and logistics support to promote the development of LED products and installations. The company is a division of Future Electronics, the third largest electronic components distributor in the world. Both companies operate in 167 locations in 42 countries in the Americas, Europe and Asia. For more information, visit www.FutureLightingSolutions.com.

Future Lighting Solutions; Making LED Lighting Solutions Simple™.

 

 

Previous Page
Terms of Use  |  Privacy Policy
© 2012 Future Electronics. All rights reserved.

Next Page